Kerodon

$\Newextarrow{\xRightarrow}{5,5}{0x21D2}$ $\newcommand\empty{}$
$\Newextarrow{\xhookrightarrow}{10,10}{0x21AA}$

Comments on Subsection 1.5.6

Go back to the page of Subsection 1.5.6.


Comment #2205 by Michael Janou on

In the proof of 1.5.6.9, one reads: "Moreover, since is weakly saturated, the class is also weakly saturated." This implication holds of course, but (unless I'm missing something here) it involves a relatively long verification with quite a bit of diagram chases (and it makes use of the fact that preserves colimits, which is something special about cartesian closed categories that doesn't hold in general). It's certainly more involved than the proof of 1.5.4.13 (to which you devoted the entire subsection 1.5.4). Perhaps it would be helpful to insert an exercise of the form "Let be a morphism of simplicial sets and let be a weakly saturated class of morphisms of simplicial sets. Show that the class of morphisms such that belongs to is weakly saturated." (if not spelling out the details yourself).

There are also:

  • 15 comment(s) on Chapter 1: The Language of $\infty $-Categories

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0078. The letter 'O' is never used.