# Kerodon

$\Newextarrow{\xRightarrow}{5,5}{0x21D2}$ $\newcommand\empty{}$

Remark 5.5.1.7. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ be a small category, let $\operatorname{Fun}( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{Set})$ be the category of set-valued functors on $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}$, and let $h: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{Fun}( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{Set})$ be the Yoneda embedding (so that $h$ carries each object $C \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to the representable functor $h_{C} = \operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}( \bullet , C)$). For any object $\mathscr {F} \in \operatorname{Fun}( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{Set})$, the category of elements $\int ^{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} \mathscr {F}$ fits into a pullback diagram

$\xymatrix@R =50pt@C=50pt{ \int ^{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} \mathscr {F} \ar [d] \ar [r] & \operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{Set})_{/\mathscr {F}} \ar [d] \\ \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\ar [r]^-{h} & \operatorname{Fun}( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{Set}). }$

This is essentially a reformulation of Yoneda's lemma (we will return to this point in ยง).