Comments on Lemma

Go back to the page of Lemma

Comment #82 by Carles Sáez on

Typo: in part a) of the statement, and also in the proof, the following formula appears: . I think it should be: with instead of in the right hand side.

Comment #85 by Kerodon on

Yep. Thanks!

Comment #211 by Eye on

Typos: in the first chain of inclusions, needs to be replaced by to account for the case ; three instances of need to be replaced by ; in the last sentence of the proof, needs to be replaced by .

Comment #215 by Kerodon on

Yep. Thanks!

There are also:

  • 11 comment(s) on Chapter 1: The Language of $\infty $-Categories

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 007F. The letter 'O' is never used.