# Kerodon

$\Newextarrow{\xRightarrow}{5,5}{0x21D2}$ $\newcommand\empty{}$

### 2.1.6 Monoidal Functors

We now introduce the unital analogue of Definition 2.1.4.4.

Definition 2.1.6.1. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories, and let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be a functor. A monoidal structure on $F$ is a nonunital lax monoidal structure $\mu = \{ \mu _{X,Y} \} _{X,Y \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$ (Definition 2.1.4.3) which satisfies the following additional conditions:

• For every pair of objects $X,Y \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$, the tensor constraint $\mu _{X,Y}: F(X) \otimes F(Y) \rightarrow F(X \otimes Y)$ is an isomorphism in $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ (that is, $\mu$ is a nonunital monoidal structure on $F$).

• There exists an isomorphism $\epsilon : \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \xrightarrow {\sim } F(\mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}})$ which is a unit for $F$ (in the sense of Definition 2.1.5.2).

A monoidal functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ is a pair $(F, \mu )$, where $F$ is a functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ and $\mu$ is a monoidal structure on $F$.

Remark 2.1.6.2. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories. We will generally abuse terminology by identifying a monoidal functor $(F,\mu )$ from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ with the underlying functor $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$. If we refer to $F$ as a monoidal functor, we implicitly assume that it has been equipped with a monoidal structure $\mu = \{ \mu _{X,Y} \} _{X,Y \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$.

Warning 2.1.6.3. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories, and let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be a nonunital lax monoidal functor. If $F$ is a monoidal functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$, then it is both a nonunital monoidal functor (that is, the tensor constraints $\mu _{X,Y}: F(X) \otimes F(Y) \rightarrow F( X \otimes Y)$ are isomorphisms) and a lax monoidal functor (that is, it admits a unit $\epsilon : \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \rightarrow F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} )$). However, the converse is false: to qualify as a monoidal functor, $F$ must satisfy the additional condition that $\epsilon$ is an isomorphism.

Remark 2.1.6.4. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories and let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be a nonunital monoidal functor. Let $\epsilon : \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \rightarrow F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} )$ be an isomorphism in the category $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$. Then $\epsilon$ automatically satisfies condition $(2)$ of Proposition 2.1.5.13: for each $X \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$, both of the maps

$\mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \otimes F(X) \xrightarrow { \epsilon \otimes \operatorname{id}_{F(X)} } F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} ) \otimes F(X) \xrightarrow { \mu _{ \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}, X} } F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} \otimes X)$

are isomorphisms. It follows that $\epsilon$ is a unit for $F$ if and only if it satisfies condition $(1)$ of Proposition 2.1.5.13: that is, if and only if the diagram

$\xymatrix@R =50pt@C=50pt{ \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \otimes \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \ar [r]^-{ \epsilon \otimes \epsilon } \ar [dd]^{ \upsilon _{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} } & F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} ) \otimes F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} ) \ar [d]^{ \mu _{ \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}, \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} }} \\ & F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} \otimes \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}) \ar [d]^{ F( \upsilon _{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}) } \\ \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \ar [r]^-{ \epsilon } & F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}) }$

is commutative. By virtue of Proposition 2.1.2.9, there exists an isomorphism $\epsilon$ satisfying this condition if and only if the pair $( F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} ), F( \upsilon _{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}) \circ \mu _{ \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}, \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}})$ is a unit of $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ (in the sense of Definition 2.1.2.5).

In other words, a nonunital monoidal functor $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ is monoidal if and only if the functors

$\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\quad \quad X \mapsto F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} ) \otimes X$
$\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\quad \quad X \mapsto X \otimes F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} )$

are fully faithful (in which case they are both canonically isomorphic to the identity functor $\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}}: \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\simeq \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$).

Example 2.1.6.5 (Strict Monoidal Functors). Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be strict monoidal categories (Definition 2.1.2.1). We say that a functor $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ is strict monoidal if it is a nonunital strict monoidal functor (Definition 2.1.4.1) which carries the strict unit object $\mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$ to the strict unit object $\mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}}$.

Every strict monoidal functor $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ can be regarded as a monoidal functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$, by taking each tensor constraint $\mu _{X,Y}$ to be the identity morphisms from $F(X) \otimes F(Y) = F(X \otimes Y)$ to itself. Conversely, if $(F, \mu )$ is a monoidal functor for which the tensor constraints $\mu _{X,Y}$ and the unit morphism $\epsilon : \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}} \rightarrow F( \mathbf{1}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} )$ are identity morphisms in $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$, then $F$ is a strict monoidal functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$.

Example 2.1.6.6. Let $M$ and $M'$ be monoids, regarded as monoidal categories having only identity morphisms (Example 2.1.2.8). Then lax monoidal functors from $M$ to $M'$ (in the sense of Definition 2.1.5.8) can be identified with monoid homomorphisms from $M$ to $M'$ (in the sense of Definition 1.3.2.3). Moreover, every lax monoidal functor from $M$ to $M'$ is automatically strict monoidal (and therefore monoidal).

Example 2.1.6.7. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ be a monoidal category, and let $\ell : \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{Fun}(\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{C}})$ be the nonunital monoidal functor of Example 2.1.4.8 (carrying each object $X \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to the functor $\ell _{X}: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ given by $\ell _{X}(Y) = X \otimes Y$). Then $\ell$ is a monoidal functor: it admits a unit $\epsilon : \operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}} \rightarrow \ell _{ \mathbf{1} }$ given by the inverse of the left unit constraint of Construction 2.1.2.17. To prove this, it suffices to verify that $\epsilon$ satisfies property $(1)$ of Proposition 2.1.5.13 (Remark 2.1.6.4). Unwinding the definitions, this is equivalent to the assertion that for every object $X \in \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$, the outer cycle of the diagram

$\xymatrix@C =50pt{ X \ar [dd]^{\operatorname{id}_ X} & \mathbf{1} \otimes X \ar [l]_-{ \lambda _ X} \ar [ddr]_{ \operatorname{id}_{ \mathbf{1} \otimes X} } & \mathbf{1} \otimes (\mathbf{1} \otimes X) \ar [l]_-{ \operatorname{id}_{ \mathbf{1} } \otimes \lambda _ X} \ar [d]^{ \alpha _{ \mathbf{1}, \mathbf{1}, X}} \\ & & (\mathbf{1} \otimes \mathbf{1}) \otimes X \ar [d]^{ \upsilon \otimes \operatorname{id}_ X} \\ X & & \mathbf{1} \otimes X \ar [ll]_{ \lambda _ X} }$

is commutative. In fact, the whole diagram commutes: for the inner cycle on the left this is immediate, and for the inner cycle on the right it follows from the definition of the left unit constraing $\lambda _{X}$ (Construction 2.2.1.11).

Example 2.1.6.8 ($2$-Cochains as Monoidal Structures). Let $G$ be a group and let $\Gamma$ be an abelian group equipped with an action of $G$. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ be the category introduced in Example 2.1.3.3, whose objects are the elements of $G$ and morphisms are given by

$\operatorname{Hom}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}(g,h) = \begin{cases} \Gamma & \text{ if } g =h \\ \emptyset & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$

Then every $3$-cocycle $\alpha : G \times G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma$ can be regarded as the associativity constraint for a monoidal structure $(\otimes , \alpha )$ on $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$. Let us write $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha )$ to indicate the category $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$, endowed with the monoidal structure $(\otimes , \alpha )$.

Suppose that we are given a pair of cocycles $\alpha ,\alpha ': G \times G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma$. Unwinding the definitions, we see that monoidal structures on the identity functor $\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha ) \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha ')$ are given by functions

$\mu : G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma \quad \quad (x,y) \mapsto \mu _{x,y}$

which satisfy the identity

$\alpha _{x,y,z} + \mu _{x,yz} + x( \mu _{y,z} ) = \mu _{xy,z} + \mu _{x,y} + \alpha '_{x,y,z}$

for $x,y,z \in G$. We can rewrite this identity more compactly as an equation $\alpha + d \mu = \alpha '$, where

$d: \{ \text{2-Cochains G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma } \} \rightarrow \{ \text{3-Cochains G \times G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma } \}$

is defined by the formula $(d\mu )_{x,y,z} = x(\mu _{y,z}) - \mu _{xy,z} + \mu _{x,yz} - \mu _{x,y}$.

In particular, the identity functor $\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$ can be promoted to a monoidal functor from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha )$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha ')$ if and only if the cocycles $\alpha$ and $\alpha '$ are cohomologous: that is, they represent the same element of the cohomology group $\mathrm{H}^{3}( G; \Gamma )$.

Notation 2.1.6.9. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories, and let $F,F': \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal functors. We say that a natural transformation $\gamma : F \rightarrow F'$ is monoidal if it is monoidal when viewed as a natural transformation of lax monoidal functors (Definition 2.1.5.18). We let $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }(\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})$ denote the category whose objects are monoidal functors from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ and whose morphisms are monoidal natural transformations. We regard $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})$ as a full subcategory of the category $\operatorname{Fun}^{\operatorname{lax}}( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})$ of Definition 2.1.5.18 (or as a non-full subcategory of the category $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }_{\operatorname{nu}}(\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})$ of nonunital monoidal functors from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$).

Warning 2.1.6.10. We will not be consistent in our usage of Notation 2.1.6.9. For example, if $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ are symmetric monoidal categories (), then we will sometimes write $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }(\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})$ to denote the category of symmetric monoidal functors from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ (which is a full subcategory of the category of monoidal functors from $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ to $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ defined in Notation 2.1.6.9).

Remark 2.1.6.11 (Compatibility with Reversal). Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories, let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be a nonunital lax monoidal functor, and let $F^{\operatorname{rev}}: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{rev}} \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}^{\operatorname{rev}}$ be as in Example 2.1.4.13. Then $F$ is a monoidal functor if and only if $F^{\operatorname{rev}}$ is a monoidal functor. This observation (and its counterpart for monoidal natural transformations) supplies an isomorphism of categories $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}) \simeq \operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{rev}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}^{\operatorname{rev}} )$.

Remark 2.1.6.12 (Opposite Functors). Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be monoidal categories, let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be a nonunital monoidal functor, and let $F^{\operatorname{op}}: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}} \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}^{\operatorname{op}}$ be the induced nonunital monoidal functor on opposite categories (Example 2.1.4.14). Then $F$ is a monoidal functor if and only if $F^{\operatorname{op}}$ is a monoidal functor. This observation (and its counterpart for monoidal natural transformations) supplies an isomorphism of categories $\operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}})^{\operatorname{op}} \simeq \operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}^{\operatorname{op}} )$.

Remark 2.1.6.13 (Composition of Monoidal Functors). Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$, $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$, and $\operatorname{\mathcal{E}}$ be monoidal categories and let $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ and $G: \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{E}}$ be functors equipped with nonunital lax monoidal structures $\mu$ and $\nu$, respectively, so that the composite functor $G \circ F$ inherits a nonunital lax monoidal structure (Construction 2.1.4.17). If $\mu$ and $\nu$ are monoidal structures on $F$ and $G$, then $G \circ F$ inherits a monoidal structure. This observation (and its counterpart for monoidal natural transformations) imply that the composition law of Construction 2.1.4.17 restricts to a functor

$\circ : \operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{E}}) \times \operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}) \rightarrow \operatorname{Fun}^{\otimes }( \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}, \operatorname{\mathcal{E}}).$

Example 2.1.6.14. Let $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$ be categories which admit finite products, endowed with the cartesian monoidal structure described in Example 2.1.3.2. For any functor $F: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}\rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}$, we can regard the opposite functor $F^{\operatorname{op}}: \operatorname{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{op}} \rightarrow \operatorname{\mathcal{D}}^{\operatorname{op}}$ as endowed with the lax monoidal structure described in Example 2.1.5.17. This lax monoidal structure is a monoidal structure if and only if the functor $F$ preserves finite products. If this condition is satisfied, then the original functor $F$ inherits a monoidal structure (Remark 2.1.6.12).

Example 2.1.6.15 ($1$-Cochains as Natural Transformations). Let $G$ be a group, let $\Gamma$ be an abelian group equipped with an action of $G$, and choose a pair of $3$-cocycles

$\alpha , \alpha ': G \times G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma ,$

which we can regard as associativity constraints for monoidal categories $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha )$ and $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}(\alpha ')$ having the same underlying category $\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}$ (Example 2.1.6.8). Suppose we are given a pair of monoidal structures $\mu$ and $\mu '$ on the identity functor $\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$, which we can identify with $2$-cochains $\mu , \mu ': G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma$ satisfying

$\alpha + d \mu = \alpha ' \quad \quad \alpha + d \mu ' = \alpha '.$

Then the difference $\nu = \mu - \mu '$ is a $2$-cocycle: that is, it satisfies the identity

$x \nu _{y,z} - \nu _{xy,z} + \nu _{x,yz} - \nu _{x,y} = 0$

for every triple of elements $x,y,z \in G$.

Note that a natural transformation from the identity functor $\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}$ to itself can be identified with a function

$\gamma : G \rightarrow \Gamma \quad \quad x \mapsto \gamma _{x};$

that is, with a $1$-cochain on $G$ taking values in the group $\Gamma$. Unwinding the definitions, we see that the natural transformation $\gamma$ is monoidal (with respect to the monoidal structures supplied by $\mu$ and $\mu '$, respectively) if and only if it satisfies the identity

$\mu '_{x,y} + x \gamma _{y} + \gamma _{x} = \mu _{x,y} + \gamma _{xy}$

for every pair of elements $x,y \in G$. We can rewrite this identity more conceptually as $\mu ' + d \gamma = \mu$, where

$d: \{ \text{1-Cochains G \rightarrow \Gamma } \} \rightarrow \{ \text{2-Cochains G \times G \rightarrow \Gamma } \}$

is defined by the formula $(d\gamma )_{x,y} = x(\gamma _{y}) - \gamma _{xy} + \gamma _{x}$. In particular, the monoidal functors $(\operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}, \mu )$ to $( \operatorname{id}_{\operatorname{\mathcal{C}}}, \mu ' )$ are isomorphic if and only if the $2$-cocycle $\nu = \mu - \mu '$ is a coboundary: that is, it has vanishing image in the cohomology group $\mathrm{H}^{2}(G; \Gamma )$.