# Kerodon

$\Newextarrow{\xRightarrow}{5,5}{0x21D2}$ $\newcommand\empty{}$

Go back to the page of Subsection 5.1.3.

Comment #1139 by Daniel Gratzer on

In the definition of $\theta$ given by Notation 5.1.3.10, do we not need to at least require that $q$ is an inner fibration to ensure that $\theta$ is a trivial Kan fibration? We later also seem to use this assumption to conclude that the fibers of this map are $\infty$-categories.

Comment #1142 by Kerodon on

Yep. Thanks!

There are also:

• 5 comment(s) on Section 5.1: Cartesian Fibrations

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).